Cost calculator / Laser cutting

Price a laser cutting job from the shop floor up.

Turn sheet utilization, productive machine cost, active labor, failures, selling fees, and a target margin into a transparent job quote.

JOB COST & QUOTE

Laser Cutting Cost Calculator

USD / job
SHEET & JOB GEOMETRYMACHINE HOURLY COSTTIME & ORDER COSTSRISK, FEES & MARGIN
MODELED JOB ECONOMICS
Recommended customer quote$105.3830.0% target margin after the entered selling fee.
Machine hourly cost$3.93 / hr
Depreciation per machine hour$1.13
Maintenance per machine hour$0.40
Electricity per machine hour$0.11
Assist gas per machine hour$0.00
Extraction / filtration per hour$0.80
Facility overhead per hour$1.50
Allocated sheet material$26.67
Sheet equivalents consumed0.667 sheets
Whole sheets needed for capacity1 sheets
Production cost per attempt$41.62
Expected attempts per successful job1.053
Failure-adjusted production cost$43.81
One-time design and setup$22.50
Packaging and other order costs$4.00
Full job cost$70.31
Full job cost per part$7.03
Break-even quote$72.79
Quote for target margin$105.38
Minimum order charge$25.00
Recommended quote per part$10.54
Selling fee at recommended quote$3.46
Profit at recommended quote$31.61
Modeled profit margin30.0%
Profit per expected machine hour$40.05

Starting values are editable illustrations, not supplier prices, shop-rate benchmarks, or a promise that a job is safe or feasible. Confirm material compatibility, fire controls, ventilation, machine capacity, geometry, kerf, nesting, cut quality, and run time with the applicable manufacturer instructions and your own test records. Inputs stay in your browser.

A laser cutting quote should pay for more than the visible piece of wood, acrylic, fabric, or metal. The shop also consumes offcut area, productive machine life, maintenance, electricity, extraction, process gas, operator time, setup time, consumables, packaging, and the expected cost of failed jobs. A payment or marketplace fee then comes out of the customer price, not out of thin air.

This calculator keeps those layers separate. It first builds a material allocation and an hourly machine cost. It then calculates one production attempt, adjusts only the repeatable production costs for full-job failures, adds one-time order costs once, and solves the revenue required for break-even and a target profit margin. The recommended quote is the higher of the calculated target price and the minimum order charge.

Use shop evidence, not the opening valuesEvery starting amount is an editable illustration. It is not a typical laser price, recommended hourly rate, supplier quote, expected machine life, or safe operating assumption. Currency selection changes formatting only and never converts an amount.

The complete laser cutting quote formula

The model separates the calculation into four questions: how much stock is allocated, what one productive machine hour costs, what a successful order is expected to cost, and how much revenue is needed after selling fees. That separation makes double counting easier to spot.

Usable sheet areasheet width × sheet height × nesting utilization
Material cost per production attemptsheet cost × (part area × quantity ÷ usable sheet area)
Machine hourly costdepreciation + maintenance + electricity + gas + extraction + facility allocation
Expected production costproduction cost per attempt ÷ (1 − full-job failure rate)
Target-margin quote(full job cost + fixed selling fee) ÷ (1 − percentage selling fee − target margin)

Allocate sheet material without pretending nesting is perfect

Sheet width and height can use millimeters, centimeters, inches, or another linear unit. Part area must use the matching square unit. For example, millimeter sheet dimensions require square millimeters for the part area. The unit cancels in the area ratio, so the calculator does not need a length-unit selector.

Nesting utilization is the share of nominal sheet area expected to carry quoted parts. It can account for edge margins, spacing, clamps, damaged stock, grain direction, protective-film defects, unusable remnants, and ordinary nesting loss. Use output from the actual nesting workflow where possible. Do not enter a high percentage simply because the parts look rectangular on screen.

Material cost is a fractional consumption allocation. The separate whole-sheet result is a capacity check, not the cost line used in the quote. A shop may buy an entire new sheet for a small job while retaining a reusable remnant. Decide consistently whether remnants remain valuable inventory. If an offcut cannot realistically be sold or used, lower utilization or add the unrecoverable amount to other order costs.

Build a machine hourly cost that can be audited

Machine depreciation spreads purchase and dedicated setup cost, less a conservative salvage value, across expected productive hours. Productive life is not the number of clock hours the machine sits in the building. It is the cutting and engraving time over which the shop expects to recover the equipment investment.

Depreciation per productive hour(machine purchase and setup − salvage value) ÷ useful productive-life hours

Annual maintenance is divided by realistic annual productive hours. Include service, cooling-system work, optics, motion components, and machine-specific upkeep only when those items are not entered as job consumables. A maintenance reserve built from several years of invoices is more defensible than a copied percentage.

Electricity uses average system watts, machine hours, and the shop's all-in kilowatt-hour price. Measure the equipment boundary deliberately. If average watts already includes the chiller and extractor, do not add their energy again through another hourly line. Gas, filtration, and facility inputs exist because their cost structures differ widely by machine and process; all of them remain editable rather than hidden behind a preset.

Trotec's official laser operating-cost example separates depreciation, maintenance and space, energy, filters, laser-tube cost, and personnel. It is a useful manufacturer example of cost categories, not a price list for another shop. MakerGauge does not import its euro amounts, utilization, or equipment assumptions.

Machine time and labor are different clocks

Cutting minutes are occupied machine time for the quoted quantity. Use a timed production file on the intended machine, material, thickness, power, speed, pass count, and quality setting. Include machine-only engraving in the same duration when it is part of this job. Do not convert all unattended cutting time into labor.

Design time covers CAD, vector cleanup, revisions, and toolpath preparation. Setup can include material loading, focus, origin, fixtures, test setup, and order administration. Hands-on production labor covers activity that repeats when a complete cutting attempt must be run again: unloading, cleaning, deburring, inspection, and comparable active handling.

The calculator treats design and setup as one-time order work. It treats hands-on production labor as part of each attempt. This distinction matters when failures are modeled. If a failed run genuinely requires a new fixture or a fresh setup, move that repeated portion from setup minutes into hands-on minutes. If a saved customer file will be reused on a reorder, quote that future order with the design input reduced rather than erasing design work from the first order.

Failure adjustment applies only to repeatable production cost

One production attempt contains allocated material, machine cutting time, repeated hands-on labor, and per-attempt consumables. Dividing this total by the success rate spreads the expected cost of failed attempts across successful orders. At a 5% full-job failure rate, the expected attempts are 1 ÷ 0.95, not 1.05.

Design, one-time setup, successful-order packaging, and other one-time order costs sit outside that division. Counting them inside the failure multiplier would assume every failed cutting run forces the shop to redesign the file, repeat all setup, and package a failed order. Counting them again after the multiplier would duplicate them a second time.

Full job costexpected production cost + one-time design/setup + packaging + other order costs

The failure input is intentionally strict: a full-job failure consumes the complete modeled production attempt and delivers no acceptable order. Partial rejects require a more detailed yield model. For mixed outcomes, calculate from actual accepted parts, consumed sheets, run hours, and repeated labor instead of classifying every imperfect batch as a total loss. A 100% failure rate has no finite successful-job cost and therefore no valid quote.

Break-even price is not the same as a profitable quote

A percentage selling fee is calculated from customer revenue. That is why simply adding the percentage to cost gives the wrong answer. The fee must be solved in the denominator. A fixed transaction charge belongs in the numerator. The break-even quote covers entered costs and selling fees but leaves zero modeled profit.

Break-even quote(full job cost + fixed selling fee) ÷ (1 − percentage selling fee)

Target margin is profit divided by customer revenue after the entered costs and selling fees. It is not markup on cost. If the selling-fee rate plus target margin reaches 100%, no finite revenue can satisfy the formula. The calculator returns “Not available” instead of inventing a quote. For a refresher, see the markup versus margin guide.

Enter the current fee from the seller's own processor or marketplace statement. Do not copy an old article or assume every card, country, currency, marketplace tier, or refund has the same fee. The dedicated Etsy fee calculator, Shopify fee calculator, and eBay fee calculator can help audit a channel before bringing the applicable effective rate back to this job model.

Why a minimum order charge belongs in the model

A mathematically profitable price can still be commercially unattractive when a tiny job interrupts production, requires communication, consumes scheduling capacity, or carries an opportunity cost larger than the modeled minutes. A minimum order charge creates an explicit acceptance floor. The recommended quote uses the higher of that floor and the target-margin calculation, then recomputes the actual profit and margin at the selected amount.

Epilog Laser's official guide to starting an engraving and cutting business identifies a minimum charge, artwork charge, materials, and item count as separate pricing considerations. MakerGauge uses those categories as a methodology reference only. It does not reuse Epilog's example prices or imply that one manufacturer's business guidance is a universal quote.

Geometry, kerf, nesting, and capacity limitations

This tool does not open DXF, SVG, AI, PDF, or CAD files. It does not calculate contour length, pierce count, lead-ins, common-line cutting, acceleration, corner behavior, raster engraving time, focus changes, multiple passes, or assist-gas flow. Part area is useful for allocating sheet stock, but two parts with equal area can have radically different run times and cut quality.

Kerf, spacing, edge clearance, hold-downs, tabs, bridges, grain direction, surface protection, defects, and thermal distortion can change nesting. Use the production nesting result for the actual part revision. If the job mixes materials or thicknesses, calculate each process group separately and combine the verified subtotals rather than averaging incompatible sheets.

The result also does not prove capacity. Compare expected machine hours with delivery windows, staffing, maintenance downtime, extraction capacity, material availability, and work already scheduled. Profit per expected machine hour is a comparison metric, not a promise that every available hour can be sold.

Safety and material compatibility are outside the quote

A positive margin never makes an unsafe job acceptable. This calculator does not determine whether a material may be laser cut, what fumes or residues it can produce, whether a fire watch is adequate, or what enclosure, extraction, filtration, personal protective equipment, gas handling, or disposal controls are required. Unknown coatings, composites, adhesives, and plastics require identification before processing.

Follow the current machine manual, material manufacturer documentation and safety data, extraction and gas-system instructions, insurer requirements, and applicable workplace, fire, environmental, and local rules. Run controlled material and quality tests before promising production. Safety controls are operational requirements first; their costs can be entered only after the process is confirmed feasible.

A defensible quoting workflow

  1. Confirm that the material, geometry, tolerance, finish, and process are feasible and safe.
  2. Nest the production-ready file and record sheet utilization for the required quantity.
  3. Time a representative run with the intended machine settings and quality checks.
  4. Build machine and labor rates from invoices, productive hours, and maintenance records.
  5. Separate repeatable attempt costs from one-time design, setup, and successful-order costs.
  6. Apply an observed full-job failure rate or run conservative and expected scenarios.
  7. Verify current selling fees, solve the target margin, and compare it with the minimum order charge.
  8. Record the assumptions and quote validity period beside the customer price.

Recalculate when the drawing revision, material, thickness, nesting, quantity, machine settings, supplier price, labor process, failure rate, fee schedule, or delivery requirement changes. The model is most useful when it preserves the reason a quote changed instead of hiding everything inside one hourly rate.

What the result intentionally does not decide

  • sales, value-added, income, payroll, or corporation tax treatment
  • freight, duties, financing cost, bad debt, refunds, or customer acquisition unless entered
  • market demand, competitor pricing, intellectual-property permission, or contract terms
  • engineering tolerances, structural performance, certification, or regulatory compliance
  • whether a remnant retains inventory value or a full sheet must be expensed immediately
  • whether the job displaces a more profitable use of constrained machine capacity

Use the output as an auditable planning estimate, then apply commercial judgment. The hidden production-cost checklist covers several overhead and workflow leaks that also affect other digital fabrication shops. MakerGauge's methodology explains input scope, rounding, and source practices.

For personalized goods where blanks are engraved in batches rather than cut from sheets, use the laser engraving pricing calculator. When a verified fabrication cost must be translated into direct and wholesale prices, continue with the handmade product pricing calculator without counting the same labor or overhead twice.

Independent educational estimateMakerGauge is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Trotec Laser, Epilog Laser, or any equipment, material, marketplace, or payment provider. Manufacturer resources are linked as primary examples of costing and workflow categories. Results are not a supplier quote, safety approval, engineering review, tax opinion, accounting advice, or guarantee of profit.

Replace every illustration with a timed job, supplier invoice, maintenance record, and fee statement before sending a quote.

Recheck the quote